Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. Discipline Film, Media and Communication. In the process, film history as a whole would be recast. If I am now arguing for an expanded concept of diegesis, it is because I not only want early cinema studies to be able to provide the paradigms for studying the cinema as a whole. There’s a problem loading this menu right now. Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. Not only is Film History as Media Archaeology impressive in its own right, as the 50th volume in ” Film Culture in Transition “, his book series with Amsterdam University Press, Elsaesser has deployed his acumen and rigor to nurture, shape and inspire a generation or two of scholars. A more thoroughgoing revisionism would have as its aim to once more re-assess the relation of the cinema—all cinema, including digital cinema and the electronic media—to diegesis, narrative and narration.

What we can note instead of convergence is a slightly different phenomenon. The media historian Lorenz Engell has referred himself specifically to Nicholas Luhmann see Engell Moreover, while the cinema seemed to stabilize around aligning the moving image with the spatial logic of narrative, the histories of television, video installations, and digital platforms indicate that there are other options. In sum, the problems and perspectives of the digital media perhaps supply more pertinent reasons for returning to early cinema and the methodologies by which it has been studied than any polemical attempt to dislodge classical cinema. Screen , Volume 59, Issue 4, 1 December , Pages —, https: A hour convenience store or an encyclopaedia? In this sense, the cinema seems to have aggravated the split, suggesting that moving pictures despite the fact that as part of mechanical memory they are also a pure storage device, where everything is recorded, for future retrieval, sorting, manipulation and access belong to the category of human memory, and thus always require an enunciative act in order to be intelligible.

Cultural Memory since Yet there are also problems the New Film History finds hard to tackle, once it steps outside its preferred terrain of early cinema. I was not at the Brighton conference, but heard about it soon after, and became interested in the kind of film historical discourse one would have to fashion, in order to attract at least the scholarly community to take a more direct interest.

Being neither a sign of de-evolution or as deviation from common film practices and its enriched history, digital cinema is merely an extension and a deepening of our filmic awareness.

The New Film History as Media Archaeology – Cinémas – Érudit

In the spirit of our attempt to treat early cinema studies as a possible template for the study also of other arcgaeology of film history and other paradigms of cinema practice, this would mean applying even archweology radically some of the founding gestures of the New Film History. My misgivings — such as they are — about media archaeology, therefore, stem from several developments: Total immersion as is the common belief is not the endgame for cinema.


Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. The status of the web page in turn is at once very unstable and yet has already become a fixture as apparently permanent as anything in the field of digital media. They may, however, modify the cultural and economic context in which they function for instance, a skill or craft can migrate from ellsaesser sphere of labour to that of art and also help establish new diegetic worlds or new media ontologies, as is the case with early—and classical—cinema practices being rediscovered by so many digital artists.

This question is restated here: Therefore, the rise of digital media forces us to recognize the inherent flaws,contradictions, shortcomings, and misconceptions in our commonly accepted picture of cinema history.

Film History as Media Archaeology: Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. Cinema’s Baroque Flesh Saige Walton.

Doing so allows us to rethink the very nature of the digital rupture which we have lived through in the last couple of decades, and which has undoubtedly been elsaeszer most vexatious question troubling film studies during this time. By elsaessser, collective or public memory has always been a contested territory of rival claims. A personal library or a business archaeoloyy An advertising billboard or a well-tended secret garden? Obviously, this triple division is in adchaeology sense a gross simplification, and its only value lies perhaps in the fact that its brevity actually draws attention to some salient and important shifts in our current understanding of cinema, so that each question, frames and reframes the cinema in distinct ways.

Film History as Media Archaeology is a fantastic continuation and crystallisation of what the Film Culture in Transition -book series has done for so many years and over so many volumes: Why or why not?

The result is nothing less than an ongoing tour de force as he analyzes contemporary Hollywood cinema in one book, film theory in another, and various permutations of German cinema in still others. Drawing upon a broad range of scholarship, including film theory, communication studies, cultural studies and new media theory, the course will consider how digital elsaezser are transforming the semiotic fabric of contemporary visual culture.

It depends first of all on the time frame you choose — whether one hundred years, or say, five hundred years.

Film History as Media Archaeology: an interview with Thomas Elsaesser and Vladimir Lukin

I, too, have looked at films from the teens and early twenties by D. In other words, my media archaeology is gradually settling into this most intriguing and for me most disturbing question: Elsaesser echoes this claim, and broadens it out to include media technologies more generally. Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. If so, how can the cinema of attractions help us re-conceptualize our understanding of these mediums? The polemic was the more timely since during the s speculation was rife about the decline of the hegemony of classical cinema from an altogether different perspective.


We would then be mapping media-convergence and self-differentiation not in terms of either a teleology or a search for origins, but in the form of forking paths of possibility, i.

Discipline Film, Media and Communication. Finally, an archaeology respects the possible distance the past has from our present perspective, and even makes it the basis of its methodology.

Just as, Elsaesser writes:. In the context of cinema studies, media archaeology has embarked on two major lines of flight to use a Deleuzian term centrifugally careering away from the unified canon of narrative-representative cinema that formed the core of the field in its first decades.

But if one were to spell out the technologies involved, one would immediately note a radical discontinuity. Working on the Sightlines I’d like to read this book on Kindle Don’t have a Kindle? If Elsaesser is able to critique his own positions, and let the critique stand or subject it to another critique, which only ends up taking us even further away from the original standpointthen how much credence are we to put in what he writes in the first place?

Or, to change the metaphor: We care about the indexicality of the photograph because we miss it in the post-photographic pixel.

Film History as Media Archaeology • Book review • Senses of Cinema

There are as many definitions of media archaeology thw as there are media archaeologists. Our media archaeology therefore also included alternative genealogies of the cinemaincluding the non-entertainment uses of the cinematic apparatus, which in turn made us aware of the elements of chance and contingency, the moments of apparent failure that contained seeds of unrealized possibilities, and thus the importance of factoring into any history of media also those events fiilm elements that did not happenbut could have happenedor those events that did happen, but whose impact fades or was subsequently suppressed.

The reign of television lasted until the mids, since when the digital media have begun to encroach on both cinema and television.

Customers who viewed this item also viewed. Like so many of the previous volumes in the series, volume 50 is bound to establish itself as a text of reference in contemporary film and media scholarship.

Future Cinema — This course examines the shift from traditional cinematic spectacle to works probing the frontiers of interactive, performative, and networked media. The question, then, is not so much: